The enemies of Senator Antonio Trillanes IV seems to have
swelled outside the halls of the Senate.
A group
of lawyers have accused Senator Antonio Trillanes IV of inciting sedition and
rebellion when the opposition senator and one of the fiercest critics of the
President “encouraged the military to
kill the President” in his privilege speech in the Senate last October.
Some
of the lawyers in the group were identified as
former Negros Oriental Rep. Jacinto “Jing” Paras as well as lawyers
Manuel Luna, Eligio Mallari, and Nasser Marohomsalic. *
This
group has stated that they will soon file a case against the senator on the
basis of his pronouncements about Mr. Duterte’s alleged ill-gotten wealth totaling
2 billion pesos.
By concocting lies and spurious documents, he has
encouraged, he has called on the military to kill the President. Sabi niya,
‘Nako kung makikita ito ng mga sundalo, M-60 machine guns ang gagamitin sa ‘yo.
Mauubos bala nito’, meaning kay Mr. President,” Paras said in a press
conference held in a Quezon City
Senator Trillanes, in his privilege speech in the Senate
last October 3, said that if soldiers would discover the amount of wealth
Duterte had allegedly amassed, they might use up all the bullets of an M-60
machine gun.
“Kung makikita ito ng mga sundalo, M-60 ang gagamitin
sa’yo kasi marami-rami ito. Mauubos ‘yung magasin, kung ₱40 million ‘yung
hinahanap mo,” the opposition senator said.
Paras said they are still studying where will they file
the complaint but “definitely, it will be filed in two to three days.”
Paras said Trillanes, one of Duterte’s most vocal
critics, committed a “criminal act of inciting the military and people to
sedition, inciting to rebellion or creating a scenario for coup d’etat.” *
According to Mallari, the statement of Trillanes could
not be considered a “mere symbolism.”
“That’s not symbolism. When you do such thing, that’s
inciting to sedition and you’re calling on all the people to act against the
President,” Mallari said.
Coordinated response?
This issue comes after the opposition senator filed plunder complaint
against Blue Ribbon chair Senator Richard “Dick” Gordon, the latter being part
of the majority bloc that supports President Duterte.
In his complaint, Trillanes accused Gordon of supposedly
funneling P193 million of his Priority Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) to
the Red Cross, where the latter serves as chairperson, concurrent to being a
senator.
This, he said, constituted conflict of interest.
“There is a very clear anomaly and/or conflict of interest in this case of Sen. Gordon making the allocation of the said funds because he has been a Governor and has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Philippine Red Cross since 2004 up to the present,” Trillanes said in his complaint.
Also named respondent was former PRC Secretary-General Gwen Pang, who Trillanes alleged had disbursed money from Red Cross funds without the required approval of the PRC Board of Governors, and funds from Gordon's PDAF without public bidding.
*
The funds from both the PRC and Gordon's PDAF went to anomalous projects, Trillanes alleged.
He also said Gordon has taken advantage of his position as PRC head to advance his political career, citing an anonymous email.
This, he said, constituted conflict of interest.
“There is a very clear anomaly and/or conflict of interest in this case of Sen. Gordon making the allocation of the said funds because he has been a Governor and has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Philippine Red Cross since 2004 up to the present,” Trillanes said in his complaint.
Also named respondent was former PRC Secretary-General Gwen Pang, who Trillanes alleged had disbursed money from Red Cross funds without the required approval of the PRC Board of Governors, and funds from Gordon's PDAF without public bidding.
The funds from both the PRC and Gordon's PDAF went to anomalous projects, Trillanes alleged.
He also said Gordon has taken advantage of his position as PRC head to advance his political career, citing an anonymous email.
Report from PDI
0 comments