The
Catholic Church under Pope Francis is weakening?
The
resignation of then Pope Benedict XVI as Pope is unheard of in the recent
church history, the reason behind it? still a big mystery to many Catholics
around the world.
The
ascension of Pope Francis was welcomed since the post of Vicar of Christ can
never be left unoccupied, but recent reports coming from the Vatican itself
that it seems the Church per se is under attack…the perpetrator is none other
than by the Pope himself. To put it simply the one that is tasked to protect
and propagate the catholic teaching is the same person who is allegedly trying
to destroy it by the spreading of heresies ( a nonconformity with the
established doctrines of the church) *
I have
quoted the entire article published in cnnphilippines.com last September 26,
2017 which carries a title “Conservatives accuse the Pope of spreading heresy."
(CNN) —
Several dozen conservative Catholic scholars and clergy have charged Pope
Francis with spreading heresy, a bold but perhaps futile salvo against Francis
and his reform-minded papacy.
The
widely publicized, theologically
dense letter was delivered to the Pope with 40 signatures on
August 11, according to its organizers. It has since gained 22 more signatures
and was released to the public on Saturday. In a press release, the organizers
say they speak for "a large number" of clergy and lay Catholics who
"lack freedom of speech."
The
letter does not accuse the Pope himself of being a heretic, but of supporting
"heretical positions" on "marriage, the moral life and the
Eucharist."
Francis
has not responded to the letter publicly and the Vatican declined to comment.
The
letter's organizers call their
challenge a "filial correction" of the Pope by his
"spiritual sons and daughters."
"Church
law itself requires that competent persons not remain silent when the pastors
of the Church are misleading the flock," the conservative Catholic clergy
and scholars said.
Specifically,
the letter charges Francis with promoting seven "heresies," most
notably through his openness to allowing some divorced and remarried Catholics
to receive Holy Communion. *
"Scandal
concerning faith and morals has been given to the Church and to the
world," the letter states. It accuses the Pope of imposing "strange
doctrines on the faithful," and asks him to publicly correct his
teachings.
The
lightning rod for complaints is the Pope's 2016 document, Amoris
Laetitia -- which has opened the possibility for some divorced
and remarried Catholics to receive communion -- and the differing
interpretations of the document, which conservatives say have sown confusion
among Catholics.
A press release accompanying
the letter calls it an "epoch-making act," with no precedent since
1333. That may be true, Catholic historians say, but likely overstates the
letter's actual significance. A number of the signees are members of a
traditionalist group that has already broken away from the Catholic Church.
Still,
the heresy charge crystallizes some conservatives' deep anxieties about Pope
Francis, especially his teachings and impromptu statements about how to apply
centuries-old Catholic doctrine to the complexities of modern life.
Last
year, four cardinals, in a letter
known as a Dubia, asked the Pope to clarify some of the same points
raised by the Catholic scholars and priests.
Pope
Francis has not responded to that letter, either.
Who's behind the heresy charge? *
None of
the heresy letter's signees are cardinals or bishops in good standing within
the Catholic church. The most prominent is Bishop Bernard Fellay, the head of
the Society of St. Pius X, a traditionalist group which broke away from the
Vatican under Pope John Paul II over doctrinal issues.
In some
ways, Fellay's participation is curious. As the letter's organizers note,
Francis has sought to welcome the conservative Society of St. Pius X, provided
they agree to certain church teachings.
Ettore
Gotti Tedeschi, former president of the Vatican bank, is also a signee.
Joseph
Shaw, one of the organizers of the letter and a professor of philosophy at
Oxford University, said that he hopes the Pope will answer the letter, but that
it wasn't written for his eyes only.
"Pope
Francis may be determined not to answer this, but it's not to say that bishops
and cardinals aren't able to absorb it," he said. "We have to press
this problem on to people who can ultimately address them."
"If
people become convinced that what he is doing is a grave mistake, the machine
will seize up," he continued. "There will be a reluctance to
implement what he is doing."
Public
spats and division followed the 2016 publication of the Amoris Laetitia, which
resulted in different bishops around the world offering different
interpretations of the teaching. *
For
example, Cardinal Kevin Farrell, an American newly appointed to a top Vatican
office by Francis last year, has publicly disagreed with Philadelphia
Archbishop Charles Chaput, about whether divorced and remarried Catholics can
receive Communion.
Bishops
conferences from Malta, Argentina, Poland, Germany and elsewhere have also
weighed in with different interpretations of the Pope's ruling.
Conservatives
contest that the Pope is tinkering with what is written in the Bible and has
been affirmed throughout centuries in the Catholic Church on marriage: that a
divorced person who is remarried without an annulment may not receive
communion, because the second marriage is considered adulterous.
"You
can have a diversion of pastoral practice on some things," says Shaw.
"But you can't have variation on whether marriage is indissoluble; you
can't have variation on whether you can receive communion."
Francis'
supporters say the Pope is not changing doctrine, but updating the practice of
how the Catholic Church can meet the realities of today's families.
"We
need to not just criticize, we need to say what our teaching is -- and that's
not just a yes and no answer," Farrell told
Catholic News Agency.
What's next?
It is
no surprise that there is resistance to change within the Catholic Church,
which claims a tradition of uninterrupted teachings since the time of Christ.
The question is whether Francis can hold together the church's left and right
flanks while implementing reforms in how the church applies those teachings. *
Monsignor
Robert Wister, a professor of church history at Seton Hall University in New
Jersey, said he can't recall anything similar to the heresy letter in recent
times. Pope John XXII was rebuked in the 1330s for teaching that the souls of
the dead do not see the face of God until the Last Judgment.
"But
it's really hard to make a comparison," he said. "Nine hundred years
ago, most Catholics were illiterate. Now everybody is on Twitter."
So what
effect will the heresy letter have on Francis' papacy?
"In
the grand scheme of things, it will fuel some of the more extreme anti-Francis
websites," Wister said. "And I think it will encourage various
priests and bishops who do not like his pastoral direction."
"But,
if you look in the pews or even at polls, most people like Francis," he
said. "They see in him a compassion they have not seen in the church, an
understanding of the very difficult reality of living in this very complicated
world."
0 comments